Print Page   |   Contact Us   |   Report Abuse   |   Sign In   |   Join the DCA
DCA Member Search
Event Calendar

07/06/2017 » 28/12/2017
Training & Education Courses in 2017

07/11/2017 » 08/11/2017
Zettastructure

07/11/2017
Westminster Forum - Energy

15/11/2017 » 16/11/2017
Data Centre World Paris 2017

22/11/2017 » 23/11/2017
EMEX 2017

Top Contributors

DCA Member's Blog
Blog Home All Blogs
Search all posts for:   

 

View all (220) posts »

Does PUE really help the case for liquid cooling?

Posted By Jon Summers, University of Leeds, 01 March 2017
Updated: 01 March 2017

When talking to interested people about liquid cooling as defined by “liquid invasion of the IT”, it seems PUE calculations do not show necessary benefits. For example, we retrofit a liquid cooling technology to the IT and for argument sake we drop the total energy draw of the digital components by 10%. We then raise the temperature onto the heat rejection system making it operate more efficiently, the average coefficient of performance increases from 3 to say 4 and UPS efficiency drops from say 91% to 89% as the critical load decreases on average. Then if we started with a PUE of 1.4 before retrofitting the liquid cooling solution would give a PUE of 1.5 (thus not helping the case). The arithmetic indicates simply that the changes in the denominator have dropped more than the numerator.

However if we use TUE [1], which is defined as total energy consumed by the entire data centre divided by the digital “only” components of the data centre, we get a different story. So before retrofitting of the liquid cooling solution the PUE of 1.4 would be a TUE of 1.63 and after retrofitting the TUE of the liquid cooling solution would be 1.58, showing improvement.

The interesting notion of this TUE is that we have a numerator which is affected by the combined digital workload and ambient conditions, whereas the denominator is only affected by the digital workload! In fact introducing ITUE (see [1]), which treats the IT (which has its own power and cooling) in the same vein as PUE for data centres, then

TUE = PUE x ITUE

TUE would have less manipulative capability for some obvious reasons. Should IT manufactures quote their ITUE at different workloads? In fact I am aware that ITUE was being looked at by the International Standards.

[1] Energy Efficient HPC Working Group https://eehpcwg.llnl.gov/pages/infra_itue.htm

Tags:  Here is an idea. 

Share |
Permalink | Comments (2)
 

Comments on this post...

...
John Booth, Carbon3IT says...
Posted 01 March 2017
How do you calculate DUE?
Permalink to this Comment }

...
Jon Summers, University of Leeds says...
Posted 09 March 2017
That is the problem John - not easy. DUE or ITUE. All of the raw digital components in a server or other datacom sit the other side of Voltage Regulators, so just see what the power is being consumed from the VR (P_VR) and then measure the power drawn by the server (or datacom unit) at the PSU (P_PSU), the ITUE = DUE = P_PSU/P_VR :)
Permalink to this Comment }

Sign In
Sign In securely
News

Data Centre Alliance

Privacy Policy